
After the shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, we wrote about the myriad failures of Broward County Public Schools (BCPS) and the Broward County Sheriffâs Office in responding to the billowing red flags hoisted by the shooter. (Much of this failed response can be traced to pressure from the U.S. Department of Education to disrupt the âschool to prison pipeline.â)
One program BCPS had established to deal with obstreperous, or even criminal, students â without suspending or expelling them or involving law enforcement — was the Preventing Recidivism through Opportunities, Mentors, Interventions, Supports & Education (PROMISE) program. PROMISE was part of a Collaborative Agreement on School Discipline signed by BCPS, the Sheriffâs Office, and others to govern how to handle these students.
Because the Parkland shooter had a long history of committing disciplinary disturbances without suffering serious consequence, it appeared likely he had been assigned to PROMISE. In fact, Broward County Sheriffâs Union president Jeff Bell said PROMISE was partly to blame for the shooterâs escaping arrest, because it âtook all discretion away from the law enforcement officers to effect an arrest if we chose to.â
BCPS and the Sheriffâs Office went ballistic over any suggestion that PROMISE was implicated in this crime. Disgraced Sheriff Scott Israel denied any connection between PROMISE and the shooter, and BCPS claimed to have âno recordâ that the shooter participated in PROMISE. Superintendent Robert Runcie reiterated that denial. The wagons were circled to protect the progressive disciplinary program, apparently at all cost.
Well, never mind. BCPS has now confirmed that the shooter was indeed assigned to the federally lauded, vehemently protected, but tragically ineffective PROMISE program. Itâs not clear how much of the program he went through, but he was in fact sent to PROMISE rather than to jail.Â
Apparently, gross incompetence isnât a firing offense at BCPS or the Sheriffâs Office, but how about lying?
I find that ” long history of committing disciplinary disturbances without suffering serious consequence,” says it all.
I watched journalist Laura Loomer report on this policy shortly after the tragedy. Cruz was well known as âthe school shooterâ by classmates. 22 times authorities were called.
I just read over the contract included in this article. Every individual, agency, and organization that signed into this agreement, should be held accountable and criminally charged as accessories to murder and terrorism!
How many more troubled students are in these programs,being ignored and waiting for someone to care? Is there any affirmative action being taken to repeal these dangerous policies?
Thank you so much for continuing to inform us and the commitment you have for our schools and children.
Agreed. They will suspend a kindergarten student for having a butter knife in his lunch, but they will let this go?
Don’t forget the student who chewed a pop tart into the shape of a gun.