Truth in American Education

Fighting to stop the Common Core State Standards, their Assessments and Student Data Mining.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • TAE Advocates
    • Network Participants
    • Related Websites
  • Common Core State Standards
    • National Education Standards
    • Gates Foundation & NCEE Influence
    • State Costs for Adopting and Implementing the Common Core State Standards
    • National Curriculum
    • Common Core State Standards Content
      • Standard Algorithms in the Common Core State Standards
    • Myths Versus Facts
    • States Fighting Back Map
    • Closing the Door on Innovation
    • CCSSI Development Teams
  • Common Core Assessments
    • Opt Out Info
  • Race To The Top
    • District-Level Race to the Top–Race to the Top IV
  • Resources
    • Legislative Bills Against CCSS
    • Pioneer Institute White Papers
    • Model Resolutions
    • Parents’ & Educators’ Executive Order
    • CC = Conditions + Coercion + Conflict of Interest
  • Audio & Video
  • Privacy Issues and State Longitudinal Data Systems
    • Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems
  • ESEA/NCLB
    • Statements and Proposed Plans
    • Every Child Achieves Act July 2015
    • Student Success Act
    • Every Child Ready for College or Career Act
    • No Child Left Behind Waivers
    • ESEA Blueprint, Briefing Book, and Position Paper
  • Home School/Private School
  • Action Center
    • Parent and Community Action Plan
    • Stop CCSSI ToolKit
    • Sign Up or Contact TAE

The Wrong Lesson on Early Childhood Education

October 11, 2018 By Shane Vander Hart

The Hechinger Report published an article on a recent study of six countries’ (Australia, England, Finland, Hong Kong, Korea, and Singapore)  approach to early childhood education. The project was led by Sharon Lynn Kagan, a professor at Columbia University’s Teachers College and Yale University and funded by the National Center on Education and the Economy. 

They drilled down on these countries because each country spends more money per child than the U.S. on early childhood education.

Lillian Monegeau writes:

In the U.S., caring for young children has long been considered the responsibility of individual families, not the government. With the exception of a few times in history where it was considered a national priority to bring women into the workforce temporarily, publicly funded child care has remained low on the list of programs receiving federal dollars. The federal money that is spent, mostly on preschool for 3- and 4-year-olds living in poverty (through programs like Head Start) and on helping states provide subsidized child care, is generally considered assistance for families struggling to make ends meet.

While all of the countries studied for “The Early Advantage” have low-income populations in need of extra assistance to provide their young ones with quality child care and education, none of them make income level a requirement for services. Instead, these countries offer near-universal systems that guarantee some level of education for children age 3 and older. Five of the countries, Hong Kong excepted, also offer provisions for infants and toddlers, whether it be subsidized care or extended (compared to the U.S.) paid parental leave.

Monegeau then shares a remarkable statement by Kagan:

“It really goes back to founding fathers,” Kagan said. “We were established to escape government tyranny. It’s always been a hands-off mentality.”

Yes, we believe parents, not the government, is responsible for the education of their kids, especially when they are young. 

The major takeaway here is that there needs to be a more substantial investment in early childhood education. That would be a waste of money since numerous studies have shown that early childhood education does not help academic achievement. So, by all means, let’s throw more money at it! 

Also, something that’s missing is that the United States has far, far more children than these other countries. It begs the obvious question: how would we pay for this?

But I’m sure education reformers will ignore those lessons and embrace this study instead. 

Read the rest.

Related

Filed Under: Education Reform Tagged With: early childhood education, preschool

Comments

  1. Florence Thompson says

    October 14, 2018 at 9:57 am

    The BABY SNATCHERS will want to make Pre-K mandatory.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter

States Fighting Back

https://app.box.com/s/10nl1409mkaf00zzzuyf

CCSS Opt-Out Form

  • Click here to download the CCSS Opt-Out Form

Follow us on Twitter

My Tweets

Campbell’s Law

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

- Donald Campbell

Copyright © 2019 Truth in American Education · Developed & Hosted by 4:15 Communications, LLC.