Truth in American Education

Fighting to stop the Common Core State Standards, their Assessments and Student Data Mining.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • TAE Advocates
    • Network Participants
    • Related Websites
  • Common Core State Standards
    • National Education Standards
    • Gates Foundation & NCEE Influence
    • State Costs for Adopting and Implementing the Common Core State Standards
    • National Curriculum
    • Common Core State Standards Content
      • Standard Algorithms in the Common Core State Standards
    • Myths Versus Facts
    • States Fighting Back Map
    • Closing the Door on Innovation
    • CCSSI Development Teams
  • Common Core Assessments
    • Opt Out Info
  • Race To The Top
    • District-Level Race to the Top–Race to the Top IV
  • Resources
    • Legislative Bills Against CCSS
    • Pioneer Institute White Papers
    • Model Resolutions
    • Parents’ & Educators’ Executive Order
    • CC = Conditions + Coercion + Conflict of Interest
  • Audio & Video
  • Privacy Issues and State Longitudinal Data Systems
    • Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems
  • ESEA/NCLB
    • Statements and Proposed Plans
    • Every Child Achieves Act July 2015
    • Student Success Act
    • Every Child Ready for College or Career Act
    • No Child Left Behind Waivers
    • ESEA Blueprint, Briefing Book, and Position Paper
  • Home School/Private School
  • Action Center
    • Parent and Community Action Plan
    • Stop CCSSI ToolKit
    • Sign Up or Contact TAE

Science Lost the Reading Wars

October 26, 2018 By Shane Vander Hart

I was emailed a story at American Public Media Reports entitled “Hard Words: Why aren’t kids being taught to read?” by Emily Hanford. 

The article discusses the battle between teaching kids phonics or whole language, and the article points out that the real loser of the “reading war” was science, in that kids are not being taught in a way that is proven to work for most children.

Read this excerpt discussing “balanced literacy” which is described as whole language repackaged with a dash of phonics on top.

“Balanced literacy was a way to defuse the wars over reading,” said Mark Seidenberg, a cognitive neuroscientist and author of the book “Language at the Speed of Sight.” “It succeeded in keeping the science at bay, and it allowed things to continue as before.” 

He says the reading wars are over, and science lost.

Seidenberg knows of a child who was struggling so much with reading that her mother paid for a private tutor. “The tutor taught her some of the basic skills that the child wasn’t getting in her whole language classroom,” he said. “At the end of the school year the teacher was proud that the child had made so much progress, and the parent said, ‘Well, why didn’t you teach phonics and other basic skills related to print in class?’ And the teacher said ‘Oh, I did. Your child was absent that day.'”
For scientists like Seidenberg, the problem with teaching just a little bit of phonics is that according to all the research, phonics is crucial when it comes to learning how to read. Surrounding kids with good books is a great idea, but it’s not the same as teaching children to read. 

Experts say that in a whole-language classroom, some kids will learn to read despite the lack of effective instruction. But without explicit and systematic phonics instruction, many children won’t ever learn to read very well.

Some kids will learn how to read in spite of the classroom instruction they’ve received. Wow, that’s a statement.

Read the rest.

Filed Under: Education Reform Tagged With: literacy, phoenics, whole language

Comments

  1. Kelly Ferreira says

    October 26, 2018 at 9:10 am

    Public school was a failure for us. When we moved to a new neighborhood we left a private school and entered the local top-rated public school. We lasted 2 years. Whole language classrooms, no weekly spelling, almost all writing was free-form journal style, and grammar was hardly discussed. Much of my kids day was centered around classroom discussions, computer use, and school assemblies. I decided to homeschool them and found the ABEKA curriculum. This is what schools are lacking: a well-organized, academic curriculum that teaches kids spelling, phonics, grammar, writing, reading, non-common core math, science and social studies. I was lucky to find a private school that uses ABEKA and I am back to teaching the 2nd grade! My 2nd graders read better than most kids that were in my son’s public middle school. Many blame the teachers or parents for our schools’ failures…I blame an academically weak curriculum or NO curriculum. Ultimately, it is the school board and administration who refuse to purchase a solid curriculum. They are easily swayed to buy expensive computer apps and programs that promise instant results. By the way, our school is able to provide a new curriculum every year and a solid education for under 5,000 per year, which is way below what public school costs.

  2. Florence Thompson says

    October 27, 2018 at 11:10 am

    As a (retired) School Psychologist much of my work was focused on diagnosing reading problems. Phonics instruction is important, but it is not a cure-all. (Many reading problems are in the visual or memory systems, for example.)

    It’s sometimes possible for children to be “over-phonixed” if it is emphasized too much as an initial approach to reading. This limits their reading speed as their brains are set up to process individual letter sounds in each word as they labor down the page.

    When reading stories to young children I recommend the Neuroligical Impress Method. (which is basically reading at a normal rate while using your finger to smoothly guide along under the line of print.) Both my husband and my son were taught to read this way and they became very early and exceptionally fast readers. Phonics was included, but was not the initial approach.

    I know I’ll probably get some arguments from people who had different experiences, as children are all different. Some kids have been saved by intensive Phonics, when nothing else worked for them.

    • LisaM says

      October 28, 2018 at 4:26 pm

      Exactly why we should let teachers have autonomy in their classrooms. I think all the methods work…..and they work differently for each individual child. It’s when one program overtakes all the others that there is a problem.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter

States Fighting Back

https://app.box.com/s/10nl1409mkaf00zzzuyf

CCSS Opt-Out Form

  • Click here to download the CCSS Opt-Out Form

Campbell’s Law

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

- Donald Campbell

Copyright © 2021 Truth in American Education · Developed & Hosted by 4:15 Communications, LLC.