Truth in American Education

Fighting to stop the Common Core State Standards, their Assessments and Student Data Mining.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • TAE Advocates
    • Network Participants
    • Related Websites
  • Common Core State Standards
    • National Education Standards
    • Gates Foundation & NCEE Influence
    • State Costs for Adopting and Implementing the Common Core State Standards
    • National Curriculum
    • Common Core State Standards Content
      • Standard Algorithms in the Common Core State Standards
    • Myths Versus Facts
    • States Fighting Back Map
    • Closing the Door on Innovation
    • CCSSI Development Teams
  • Common Core Assessments
    • Opt Out Info
  • Race To The Top
    • District-Level Race to the Top–Race to the Top IV
  • Resources
    • Legislative Bills Against CCSS
    • Pioneer Institute White Papers
    • Model Resolutions
    • Parents’ & Educators’ Executive Order
    • CC = Conditions + Coercion + Conflict of Interest
  • Audio & Video
  • Privacy Issues and State Longitudinal Data Systems
    • Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems
  • ESEA/NCLB
    • Statements and Proposed Plans
    • Every Child Achieves Act July 2015
    • Student Success Act
    • Every Child Ready for College or Career Act
    • No Child Left Behind Waivers
    • ESEA Blueprint, Briefing Book, and Position Paper
  • Home School/Private School
  • Action Center
    • Parent and Community Action Plan
    • Stop CCSSI ToolKit
    • Sign Up or Contact TAE

Upcoming Common Core Bill in North Dakota

January 8, 2015 By Shane Vander Hart

north-dakota-state-flagState Representative Jim Kasper (R-Fargo) told Truth in American Education that he is introducing a bill in the North Dakota House of Representatives that would withdraw North Dakota from Common Core and Smarter Balanced.  The North Dakota Legislature only meets on odd years so they could not introduce a bill last year.

I obtained a draft copy of the bill from a local activist.  Since this is a draft copy the language could very well change.

There is a lot going on in this bill, which could be its weakness.  Smaller, straightforward bills are easier for legislators to get behind.  There are a number of interesting aspects of this bill.

Here are some highlights….

  • It moves the State Superintendent of Public Instruction’s role from a supervisor of developing educational standards to that of a participant.
  • It also places limitations on the Superintendent.  The bill states, “may not commit this state or any political subdivision of this state to participate, at any level, in any organization, consortium, association, or like entity, if the participation requires, will require, or potentially could require either an expenditure of public funds or changes in the laws of this state.”  It doesn’t allow the Superintendent to be a signatory either unless their is legislative consent and public hearings have been held.
  • It requires school districts to provide a copy of the state standards being used, a translation of them for those who don’t have an education background, and a copy of the curriculum being used by teachers in subject areas where standards exist.
  • School districts have to provide copies of assessments they use so adults over the age of 21 can review them.
  • It creates a commission on North Dakota standards and assessments whose role is to develop and oversee standards developed for North Dakota.  Membership requires an education background and/or content expertise with an advanced degree.
  • The new standards in English, math and science are required to be internationally benchmarked.
  • A new assessment is to be developed for 3rd through 12th grades and aligned to the new standards.
  • The commission would maintain a list of materials and curriculum that is aligned to the new standards.  The bill reemphasizes that the decisions about curriculum is for local school boards.
  • There is language directing the Governor and Superintendent of Public Instruction to pull North Dakota out of the Smarter Balanced Consortium.
  • It lists assessments that can be used in the 2015-2016 in the interim while the new assessment is being developed.
  • It restricts the type of data that schools can collect and specifies schools may only obtain data from parents and guardians directly.  Schools have to explain why they need the data, how it will be handled, how it will be stored, etc.
  • The bill also addresses what will be done in the event the Federal Department of Education decides to respond to this bill by pulling Federal funding.

Filed Under: Common Core State Standards, Education at State Level Tagged With: Common Core, Jim Kasper, North Dakota House of Representatives, North Dakota State Superintendent of Education

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter

States Fighting Back

https://app.box.com/s/10nl1409mkaf00zzzuyf

CCSS Opt-Out Form

  • Click here to download the CCSS Opt-Out Form

Campbell’s Law

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

- Donald Campbell

Copyright © 2021 Truth in American Education · Developed & Hosted by 4:15 Communications, LLC.