Truth in American Education

Fighting to stop the Common Core State Standards, their Assessments and Student Data Mining.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • TAE Advocates
    • Network Participants
    • Related Websites
  • Common Core State Standards
    • National Education Standards
    • Gates Foundation & NCEE Influence
    • State Costs for Adopting and Implementing the Common Core State Standards
    • National Curriculum
    • Common Core State Standards Content
      • Standard Algorithms in the Common Core State Standards
    • Myths Versus Facts
    • States Fighting Back Map
    • Closing the Door on Innovation
    • CCSSI Development Teams
  • Common Core Assessments
    • Opt Out Info
  • Race To The Top
    • District-Level Race to the Top–Race to the Top IV
  • Resources
    • Legislative Bills Against CCSS
    • Pioneer Institute White Papers
    • Model Resolutions
    • Parents’ & Educators’ Executive Order
    • CC = Conditions + Coercion + Conflict of Interest
  • Audio & Video
  • Privacy Issues and State Longitudinal Data Systems
    • Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems
  • ESEA/NCLB
    • Statements and Proposed Plans
    • Every Child Achieves Act July 2015
    • Student Success Act
    • Every Child Ready for College or Career Act
    • No Child Left Behind Waivers
    • ESEA Blueprint, Briefing Book, and Position Paper
  • Home School/Private School
  • Action Center
    • Parent and Community Action Plan
    • Stop CCSSI ToolKit
    • Sign Up or Contact TAE

Standards & Testing Won’t Help South Carolina’s Education Problem

July 23, 2013 By Shane Vander Hart

Dr. Paul Thomas of Furman University in South Carolina wrote an op/ed for The State.  He said the the Kids Count report by the Annie E. Casey Foundation which examines child well-being shows that perhaps South Carolina needs to focus its resources on something other than standards and testing mandates.

More children are attending preschool, more students are proficient in reading and math, fewer children are born with low birth weights, more have health insurance and there are fewer child and teen deaths, but in all cases the good numbers remain low and the bad numbers high, and children elsewhere are improving more. Meantime, the portion of children living in poverty, with parents who lack secure employment and neither in school nor working rose. So did the portion of children in single-parent families and living in high-poverty areas.

Our state, in short, remains heavily burdened by the negative consequences of poverty and social inequity, complicated factors often reflected in the measurable outcomes of our schools. This report offers South Carolina and its leaders an opportunity to change the discourse about school reform and take bold action that addresses the wide range of social and economic challenges facing our state.

While the data show that social and education reform should remain priorities, they also suggest that social reform is far more pressing than expensive and historically ineffective commitments to new standards and tests that are promoted for education reform.

Children in South Carolina deserve better schools, and our children in poverty remain the students most underserved in those schools. Certainly education reform shouldn’t be set aside, but many school-reform policies are simply wastes of taxpayers’ money and educators’ time — resources that would be better spent on reform that addresses the conditions of teaching and learning and not just more of the same standards-and-testing mandates tried for 30 years now.

We may not agree on every solution, but I agree with him that the Common Core State Standards and reforms like it will not do anything to address student achievement when there are so many factors outside of school that impact it.

Filed Under: Common Core State Standards Tagged With: Annie E. Casey Foundation, Common Core State Standards, Furman University, Kids Count 2013, Paul Thomas, South Carolina schools, The State

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter

States Fighting Back

https://app.box.com/s/10nl1409mkaf00zzzuyf

CCSS Opt-Out Form

  • Click here to download the CCSS Opt-Out Form

Campbell’s Law

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

- Donald Campbell

Copyright © 2021 Truth in American Education · Developed & Hosted by 4:15 Communications, LLC.