Truth in American Education

Fighting to stop the Common Core State Standards, their Assessments and Student Data Mining.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • TAE Advocates
    • Network Participants
    • Related Websites
  • Common Core State Standards
    • National Education Standards
    • Gates Foundation & NCEE Influence
    • State Costs for Adopting and Implementing the Common Core State Standards
    • National Curriculum
    • Common Core State Standards Content
      • Standard Algorithms in the Common Core State Standards
    • Myths Versus Facts
    • States Fighting Back Map
    • Closing the Door on Innovation
    • CCSSI Development Teams
  • Common Core Assessments
    • Opt Out Info
  • Race To The Top
    • District-Level Race to the Top–Race to the Top IV
  • Resources
    • Legislative Bills Against CCSS
    • Pioneer Institute White Papers
    • Model Resolutions
    • Parents’ & Educators’ Executive Order
    • CC = Conditions + Coercion + Conflict of Interest
  • Audio & Video
  • Privacy Issues and State Longitudinal Data Systems
    • Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems
  • ESEA/NCLB
    • Statements and Proposed Plans
    • Every Child Achieves Act July 2015
    • Student Success Act
    • Every Child Ready for College or Career Act
    • No Child Left Behind Waivers
    • ESEA Blueprint, Briefing Book, and Position Paper
  • Home School/Private School
  • Action Center
    • Parent and Community Action Plan
    • Stop CCSSI ToolKit
    • Sign Up or Contact TAE

An Early Look at Smarter Balanced Assessments

May 29, 2013 By Shane Vander Hart

The Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium just released a practice test to give administrators, teachers, parents, students and other stakeholders an early look at a test that will be implemented in partner states in the 2014/2015 school year.

You can read up on it here to see the technology requirements.  You can go here to enter the practice portal.

Filed Under: SBAC Tagged With: Common Core State Standards, practice tests, Smarter Balanced Assessments

Comments

  1. duchesslt says

    May 31, 2013 at 12:14 pm

    Hi, Shane! An interesting development here in NC…I had reviewed the early released items and now took the practice test (Language Arts 6th grade) and wrote an email requesting our NC Superintendent to please be transparent as to the Consortium work and allow parents to understand why these tests are a benefit, what they will cost, and most alarmingly with what is academia’s multiple choice obsession to ask trick questions (‘most precise’, ‘best represents’) that are more confusing than they are rigourous – if these tests are meant to simply establish literacy and mathematics baselines and strengths and weaknesses.

    She took the time to respond and seemed to remain fairly neutral and objective on Smarter Balanced and stated she would like parents to learn more about the effort. She reminded me that ultimately, the NC legislature will decide if these tests are adopted or not, regardless of the Smarter Balanced MOU signed by states which in spirit commits the state to these. I was also corrected that although PARCC went with Pearson, SBAC didn’t.

    Dr. Atkinson said she would like to meet with me and welcomed to have me write/speak to her about SBAC.

    I think there is an understanding at our educational leadership level that people, parents, constituents form part of these discussions. I also don’t think they ever envisioned this kind of questioning and overall backlash towards what they may have started with good intentions, yet sold their souls by agreeing to the Race to the Top funds the states desperately needed and heeded by bowing to the almighty demands of Arne Duncan and the unprecedented discretion he was granted by Obama through Congress failure to act on NCLB and the then discretionary funding given to Arne Duncan through the stimulus act.

    The only way I see any kind of proper return of education to the capable hands of parents, students, teachers is to depoliticize the conversation. As long as we make education about republican, democrat, tea party, conservatism, progressivism, socialism – we will compromise the fate of education into the hands of politicians motivated less by what we have to say and know and more by who funds their electoral campaigns.

    I got a response from Dr. June Atkinson to open dialogue because the conversation was about a school leader to a parent – not a school leader to a ‘political movement X’ – I think it’s important we remember this is about our kids. That education is the foundation that our kids later along with life experiences use to select their own parties and ideologies – but for the sake of seeing change, it is something we need to discuss as people (parents, grandparents, students, teachers, etc.) and not as ‘bipartisans’ or ‘partisans’ or anything at all related to politics.

    • Shane Vander Hart says

      May 31, 2013 at 12:19 pm

      Thanks for the update. Great points!

      • duchesslt says

        May 31, 2013 at 2:59 pm

        Yet sadly naïve ones at the same time…

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Phone
  • Twitter

States Fighting Back

https://app.box.com/s/10nl1409mkaf00zzzuyf

CCSS Opt-Out Form

  • Click here to download the CCSS Opt-Out Form

Campbell’s Law

"The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor."

- Donald Campbell

Copyright © 2021 Truth in American Education · Developed & Hosted by 4:15 Communications, LLC.